State Legislation

California Adopts Privacy, Cybersecurity, ADMT Regulations and Amendments

The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) has adopted final regulations on privacy risk assessments, cybersecurity audits, and automated decisionmaking technology (ADMT), as well as amendments to existing CCPA regulations.  Final publication of the regulations is pending review by the Office of Administrative Law, and depending on when that occurs, the regulations will likely take effect 10/1/2025 or 1/1/2026.  Some key concepts from these regulations, and actions to consider, are below.

Privacy risk assessments

Article 10 of the new regulations contain requirements for risk assessments.  Risk assessments will be required when any of the following triggers apply:

  1. personal information is "sold" or "shared" (for cross-context behavioral advertising);

  2. sensitive personal information is processed;

  3. automated decisionmaking technology ("ADMT") is used for certain significant decisions;

  4. automated processing occurs to infer or extrapolate certain matters or characteristics about a person based on systematic observation in their capacity as an educational program applicant, job applicant, student, employee, or independent contractor;

  5. automated processing occurs to infer or extrapolate certain matters or characteristics about a person based on their presence in a sensitive location (e.g., medical facility, shelter, place or worship, etc.); or

  6. personal information is processed for certain ADMT training purposes.

While the first three triggers are similar to ones in other states, they will have a broader impact since the CCPA also applies to personal information of employees, candidates, and B2B business contacts.  The last three triggers are not similar to ones that exist in other states.

Documented risk assessments must cover a number of specific topics that are detailed in the regulations, including regarding the purposes, types of personal information, specific operational elements of processing, risks and benefits, safeguards, ADMT processing, assessment contributors and approver details.  Companies may need to update privacy assessment processes to include this additional scope, and additional resources may be needed to support assessment processes.

There are some additional expectations for risk assessments under these regulations:

  • Risk assessments must be based on involvement of knowledgeable stakeholders at the organization.

  • Risk assessments must be approved by the business decisionmaker for the processing activity.

  • Risk assessments must be reviewed and updated at least every three years, and whenever there is a material change to a processing activity.

Unlike other states, California will also require proactive submission of certain assessment information to the State.  The full assessments won't need to be submitted, but details on the number of assessments, processing activities involved, and types of personal information involved, will need to be submitted.  Also, the executive team member with responsibility over the risk assessment process (like a General Counsel) must submit an attestation (under penalty of perjury) that risk assessments were conducted.  This requirement must be complied with by April 1, 2028, and will apply for risk assessments conducted in 2026-2027. 

In the months ahead, companies that are subject to the CCPA should consider:

  • Updating assessment triggers so that assessments are conducted when these risk assessments are required;

  • Validating that current assessment processes cover required components for risk assessments, and if not, planning to close any gaps by 2026;

  • Confirming business stakeholders understand when assessments are required, and that business processes trigger assessments when required, and

  • Socializing upcoming certification requirements with the executive team member that will be accountable, including any outstanding resource needs that will be required to support required certifications.

Cybersecurity audit regulations

Article 9 of the regulations contain the new cybersecurity audit requirements.  For many companies, these may be the most comprehensive cybersecurity audit requirements required under U.S. law.

Cybersecurity audits will be required for businesses:

  • with $25M+ in global annual revenue that process: (i) personal information of 250k+ consumers/employees per year; or (ii) sensitive personal information of 50k+ consumers/employees per year; or

  • that make 50% or more of their revenue from selling or sharing personal information. 

Audits must be independent, and conducted by an external entity or internal team that reports directly to an executive team member that does not oversee cybersecurity.  Many companies' existing internal security assessment processes may not satisfy the independence requirements in the regulations.

Audits must cover eighteen components of the cybersecurity program noted in the regulation, including elements that may be beyond the scope of current security programs or audits.  These include:

  • Multifactor authentication, authentication, and password requirements

  • Encryption of personal information in transit and at rest

  • Access controls, account management, and management of privileged accounts

  • Personal information and asset inventories

  • Hardware and software configuration and patch management

  • Vulnerability scanning and penetration testing

  • Logging and log monitoring

  • Network monitoring and intrusion defense

  • Antivirus and malware protection

  • Network segmentation

  • Port, service, and protocol management

  • Cybersecurity threat awareness and monitoring

  • Cybersecurity training and education

  • Secure development and coding protocols, reviews, and testing

  • Vendor management and monitoring

  • Personal information retention and deletion protocols

  • Security incident response processes, and

  • Business continuity and data recovery capabilities.

Audits must cover entire calendar years, starting with calendar year 2027 for some businesses, and 2028 or 2029 for others.  Audit reports are required, and must include a number of details specified in the regulations.

Annual certifications that the audit has been completed, and was independent, must be submitted to the CPPA (under penalty of perjury) by the executive team member who was directly responsible for the business's audit compliance.

For next steps, companies should consider:

  • Determining whether they are in-scope, and if so, by when they must comply;

  • If in scope, assessing whether existing audit practices meet independence requirements;

  • Assessing whether each of the 18 domains the audit must cover are addressed in current audit practices, and for any gaps, planning to address by the end of 2026 or before the audit requirements apply; and

  • Socializing the requirements and any resource needs with the executive team member that will make the required certifications.

Automated decisionmaking technologies

Article 11 of the regulations contain requirements for companies that make certain uses of ADMT.  The ADMT regulations won't impact all companies, but they should be reviewed to determine if they apply.

ADMT means technology that processes personal information and uses computation to replace or substantially replace human decisionmaking.  Companies that use ADMT to make certain significant decisions have additional obligations under the regulations.  These significant decisions include ones that result in the provision or denial of:

  • financial or lending services,

  • housing,

  • education enrollment or opportunities,

  • employment or independent contracting opportunities or compensation, or

  • healthcare services.

There are requirements for pre-use notices before these ADMT uses occur.  Requirements for the notices include:

  • Presenting them where or before personal information used for the in-scope ADMT processing will be collected (or if already collected, before it is used for in-scope ADMT);

  • Including the specific purpose for using the in-scope ADMT;

  • Detailing how it the ADMT works to make decisions, and how outputs are used;

  • Disclosing alternative processes for making significant decisions if consumers opt-out; and

  • Listing how consumers can opt-out, and exercise their right to access.

Consumers have rights to opt-out of uses of ADMT to make significant decisions, subject to certain exceptions in the regulations.  The regulations include a number of operational requirements for how businesses need to accept and honor these opt-out requests.

Consumers have rights to "access ADMT" by requesting details about its use to make significant decisions.  The regulations have operational requirements for how these rights need to be offered and honored, and specify a number of details that need to be provided in response to the right.

Companies must come into compliance with these ADMT regulations by January 1, 2027.

As next steps, consider:

  • Assessing if existing company practices will be subject to these ADMT regulations;

  • Updating AI and/or privacy assessment processes to identify when new proposed AI or personal information processing practices will be subject to these ADMT regulations; and

  • If in scope for these regulations, beginning planning for how pre-use notices and individual rights will be addressed before the regulations become effective.

Additional CCPA regulation updates

In addition to adopting the new regulations above, the CPPA also approved amendments to the existing CCPA regulations.  These amendments impact the regulations regarding:

  • obtaining consent;

  • practices that constitute dark patterns;

  • where and how connected devices and AR/VR providers need to inform people of their rights to opt-out of sales and "sharing";

  • where and how businesses need to inform people or their rights to limit uses and disclosures of sensitive personal information;

  • individual rights fulfillment obligations (including for correction, opt-out of sale/sharing via GPC or opt-out signal, and to know/access),  which may require process or operational changes for some businesses;

  • New metrics reporting for ADMT related DSRs for certain businesses; and

  • Requiring businesses to display whether opt-out signals like GPC have been honored on a website.

As a next steps, consider:

  • Reviewing these updates, particularly your company seeks to obtain consent, offers choices regarding the processing of personal information, and for sensitive personal information usage and sharing;

  • Validating that individual rights processes address the updated requirements; and

  • Planning to display on your website that the GPC signal has been honored.

Companies that agree to act as service providers or contractors under the CCPA will also have obligations under the regulations (and independent of contract terms) to cooperate with their business customers in: (1) the business's completion of its cybersecurity audit (including providing all relevant information requested to complete the audit); and (2) the business's risk assessments (including providing all facts necessary to conduct the risk assessment). 

Hintze Law PLLC is a Chambers-ranked and Legal 500-recognized, boutique law firm that provides counseling exclusively on global privacy, data security, and AI law. Its attorneys and data consultants support technology, ecommerce, advertising, media, retail, healthcare, and mobile companies, organizations, and industry associations in all aspects of privacy, data security, and AI law.

Sam Castic is a Partner with Hintze Law, chair of the firm’s Retail Group, and co-chair of the Cybersecurity and Breach Response Group and FinTech + Financial Services Group. As a former chief privacy officer, he helps companies build, scale, and right-size privacy programs and strategies.

California’s Healthline.com Enforcement Action Shows CCPA’s Teeth – and Sensitive Data Reach

California’s Healthline.com Enforcement Action Shows CCPA’s Teeth – and Sensitive Data Reach

By Mason Fitch and Kate Black

The California Attorney General’s Office (“OAG”) announced an enforcement action against Healthline.com on July 1 that marks a significant development in California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) enforcement. This action, accompanied by the largest fine under CCPA yet at $1.55 million, highlights critical areas of consideration for any company engaging in the advertising ecosystem as well as any company that processes sensitive personal information.

Read More

State Privacy Regulators Announce Formation of Collaboratory Consortium

State Privacy Regulators Announce Formation of Collaboratory Consortium

by Felicity Slater and Susan Hintze

On April 16, 2025, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) and state Attorneys General from California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Indiana, New Jersey, and Oregon announced the formation of the bipartisan "Consortium of Privacy Regulators." The focus of the Consortium will be to foster multi-state coordination, including sharing of expertise and resources, in investigation of potential violations of and enforcement of their state's respective comprehensive privacy laws.

Read More

Virginia Governor Signs Reproductive Health Data Restrictions into Law

Virginia Governor Signs Reproductive Health Data Restrictions into Law

by Cameron Cantrell and Felicity Slater 

On March 24, 2025, Governor Youngkin (R) of Virginia signed SB 754—which amends the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (VCPA) to restrict the collection and processing of “reproductive or sexual health information” and is enforceable through a private right of action—into law. The law will take effect July 1, 2025. 

Read More

Don’t Sleep on Maryland: The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Will Keep Health and Wellness Companies Up at Night

Don’t Sleep on Maryland: The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Will Keep Health and Wellness Companies Up at Night

By Felicity Slater and Kate Black

The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act (“MODPA” or the “Act”), which takes effect October 1, 2025, establishes a set of novel requirements that will have a particular impact for companies operating in the health and wellness sectors. 

Read More
Don’t Sleep on Maryland: The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Will Keep Health and Wellness Companies Up at Night — Hintze

New York Legislature Passes Extraordinarily Restrictive Health Data Privacy Bill

New York Legislature Passes Extraordinarily Restrictive Health Data Privacy Bill

By Mike Hintze and Felicity Slater

Last year, we wrote about a proposed New York State law that would have significant impacts for entities that process health and wellness related data. That bill failed to pass before the 2024 legislative session ended. But today, in the early days of the 2025 session, the New York State legislature has passed Senate Bill S929 (SB S929), which is essentially unchanged from last year’s bill.  

Read More
Don’t Sleep on Maryland: The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Will Keep Health and Wellness Companies Up at Night — Hintze

10 areas for US-based privacy programs to focus in 2025

10 areas for US-based privacy programs to focus in 2025

By Sam Castic

The post below was originally published by the IAPP at https://iapp.org/news/a/10-areas-for-privacy-programs-to-focus-in-2025.

This past year was another jammed one for privacy teams and it was not easy to stay on top of all the privacy litigation, enforcement trends, and new laws and regulations in the U.S.

Read More

In ‘Holy Redeemer’ Settlement Agreement, OCR Continues to Prioritize Privacy Protections for Reproductive Health Information

In ‘Holy Redeemer’ Settlement Agreement, OCR Continues to Prioritize Privacy Protections for Reproductive Health Information

by Felicity Slater and Kate Black

On November 26, 2024, the Office of Civil Rights (OCR) at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced a resolution agreement and corrective plan with Pennsylvania’s Holy Redeemer Hospital (Holy Redeemer). The agreement settles OCR’s claim that Holy Redeemer disclosed a patient’s protected health information (PHI)—including intimate reproductive health details—without a permissible purpose or valid authorization from the patient in violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule

Read More

California Legislature Passes the Delete Act

By Taylor Widawski

On September 15, 2023, the California Legislature passed Senate Bill 362, known as the Delete Act, which amends the California data broker law. The bill now awaits a signature from the governor. If signed, certain aspects of the law will go into effect as soon as January 31, 2024.

Read More
Don’t Sleep on Maryland: The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Will Keep Health and Wellness Companies Up at Night — Hintze

Washington My Health My Data Act - Part 8: Notice Obligations

By Mike Hintze

When it comes into effect, the Washington My Health My Data Act (MHMDA or the Act) will impose new privacy notice obligations on regulated entities. The Act requires specific privacy disclosures relating to data that meets the very broad definition of “consumer health data.” It appears to require regulated entities to draft, post, link to, and maintain a separate “Consumer Health Data Privacy Policy” that will be largely, but not entirely, redundant of their existing privacy statement(s).

Because the Consumer Health Data Privacy Policy will be publicly available and easily scrutinized by plaintiffs’ lawyers and the Washington Attorney General, mistakes implementing this obligation are likely to be a key source of costly and disruptive litigation. Regulated entities will therefore need to take great care in meeting the Act’s notice requirements which are, in some respects, unusual and unexpected. 

Read More
Don’t Sleep on Maryland: The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Will Keep Health and Wellness Companies Up at Night — Hintze

Washington My Health My Data Act – Part 7: Biometric Data

By Mike Hintze & Jevan Hutson

Biometric data is among the broad range of “consumer health data” regulated by the Washington My Health My Data Act (MHMDA). In light of MHMDA’s broad definition of biometric data, GDPR-level consent requirements, new obligations, and private right of action, the Act dramatically changes and complicates the regulation of biometric data in Washington state and is poised to become the most disruptive change in U.S. biometric privacy law since Illinois’ BIPA.

Read More
Don’t Sleep on Maryland: The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Will Keep Health and Wellness Companies Up at Night — Hintze

Washington My Health My Data Act - Part 6: Data Subject Rights

By Mike Hintze

The Washington My Health My Data Act provides consumers with several rights, including a right of access, a right to delete, a right to withdraw consent, and a right to not be discriminated against for exercising their rights. While each of these rights can be found in other privacy laws and so, at a high level, do not seem particularly surprising here, the ways they are included in this Act are unique, create uncertainty, and in some cases go well beyond what exists in any other privacy law.  As a result, regulated entities seeking to comply with them will face difficult, costly, and disruptive implementation challenges (and with respect to the deletion right, the potential for catch-22 situations where full legal compliance may be impossible). These challenges, along with the Act’s private right of action, set up a significant risk of expensive legal claims and litigation.

Read More
Don’t Sleep on Maryland: The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Will Keep Health and Wellness Companies Up at Night — Hintze

Washington My Health My Data Act - Part 5: Consent Requirements

By Mike Hintze

When it comes into effect, the Washington My Health My Data Act will impose strict consent requirements on a wide range of common data collection and processing activities. In essence, the Act requires affirmative (opt-in) consent for any collection, use, disclosure, or other processing of consumer health data beyond what is necessary to provide a consumer-requested product or service. For anything that could be considered a data “sale,” the authorization requirements are so onerous and risky that they, in effect, create a prohibition.

Read More
Don’t Sleep on Maryland: The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Will Keep Health and Wellness Companies Up at Night — Hintze

Washington My Health My Data Act - Part 4: Effective Dates

By Mike Hintze

Yesterday the amended Senate version of the Washington My Health My Data Act was approved by the Washington State Legislature. Now that it is a near certainty the Act will become law in its current form, entities subject to the Act need to start preparing to comply. The key factor in determining deadlines for having compliance measures in place is the effective date of the Act. The Act purports to come into effect on March 31, 2024 (and for small businesses, three months later on June 30, 2024). However, contrary to stated legislative intent, and due to what one can only conclude is, at least in part, a drafting error, some of the key substantive provisions of the Act may come into effect much sooner than expected - as soon as July 2023. 

Read More
Don’t Sleep on Maryland: The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Will Keep Health and Wellness Companies Up at Night — Hintze

Washington My Health My Data Act - Part 3: The Scope of Entities and Consumers Captured by the Act

By Mike Hintze

The Washington My Health My Data Act applies to “regulated entities” that collect or process “consumer health information” from “consumers.” Part two of this series addressed the definition of “consumer health data” and how that definition results in a scope of applicability that is far beyond what we might typically think of as sensitive health data. But the other two above-quoted defined terms – “regulated entity” and “consumer” also result in a very broad (and in some ways surprising) scope and impact. 

Read More
Don’t Sleep on Maryland: The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Will Keep Health and Wellness Companies Up at Night — Hintze

Washington My Health My Data Act - Part 2: The Scope of “Consumer Health Data”

By Mike Hintze

The substantive requirements of the Washington My Health My Data Act apply to collection, use, and disclosure of “consumer health data.” While there are a few important exclusions, the stunning breath of that term's definition, means that it will be difficult to safely conclude that any category of personal data is out of scope of the Act. As a result, it is inaccurate to refer to the Washington My Health My Data Act as a “health data privacy law.” On the contrary, it is, in effect, a generally-applicable privacy law. 

Read More
Don’t Sleep on Maryland: The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Will Keep Health and Wellness Companies Up at Night — Hintze

The Washington My Health My Data Act - Part 1: An Overview

By Mike Hintze

The Washington My Health My Data Act will become the most consequential privacy legislation enacted in 2023. The sweeping scope and extreme substantive obligations, combined with vague terms and with a full private right of action, make this Act extraordinarily challenging and risky for entities seeking to comply with its requirements.

Read More
Don’t Sleep on Maryland: The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Will Keep Health and Wellness Companies Up at Night — Hintze

Utah's Social Media Regulation Act - Overview of Privacy & Business Impact

By Alex Schlight and Leslie Veloz

Just a year after passing a comprehensive privacy law, Utah becomes the first state in the United States to pass a law that significantly regulates minors' access to, and use of, social media sites. The law is much broader than kids’ privacy laws like the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), or California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act passed last year in that it significantly limits when and how minors under the age of 18 can use social media, gives parent’s broad rights to consent to and access accounts, and places extensive restrictions on social media company activities, including, prohibiting the display of ads to minors, targeting or suggesting groups, services, products, and posts and use of addictive design.

Read More
Don’t Sleep on Maryland: The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Will Keep Health and Wellness Companies Up at Night — Hintze

Iowa Passes Sixth State Comprehensive Privacy Law

By Sheila Sokolowski

Senate File 262, a comprehensive privacy law, was signed by the Governor of Iowa on March 28, 2023, thereby becoming law. As a result, Iowa has officially become the sixth state with a comprehensive privacy law, joining California, Colorado, Connecticut, Utah, and Virginia.  

Read More
Don’t Sleep on Maryland: The Maryland Online Data Privacy Act Will Keep Health and Wellness Companies Up at Night — Hintze